Latest Movie :
Recent Movies

Suddenly...

Pictured, center-frame: Young woman, cosplaying as "Bayonetta."


Pictured, bottom-left: Young boy, in the midst of what will be a defining moment of his adolescence.



(photo by Shiraz Malik, seen on Kotaku.)

Anne Rice comes back to the dark side

"Liberace was gay" has finally been knocked the #1 spot of all-time celebrity "duh!" revelations, as Catholic-turned-atheist-turned-Christian-turned-whothehellknows author Anne Rice has evidently discovered that organized Christianity is - shockingly! - NOT all that welcoming to left-leaning feminists best known for sexually-explicit romance novels about bisexual vampires and BDSM-reworkings of fairytales. Wicked shock'a, as we say here in Boston.

Says Rice on her Facebook:
"As I said below, I quit being a Christian. I'm out. In the name of Christ, I refuse to be anti-gay. I refuse to be anti-feminist. I refuse to be anti-artificial birth control. I refuse to be anti-Democrat. I refuse to be anti-secular humanism. I refuse to be anti-science. I refuse to be anti-life. In the name of ...Christ, I quit Christianity and being Christian. Amen."

All of which places me in the unusual (for me) position of genuinely enjoying something written by Anne Rice ;)

A Strange proposal...

In the midst of some "Intermission" comment reading/responding, it dawns on me that since physicality isn't so much a concern when it comes to the potential casting for a "Doctor Strange" movie; one of the key questions would probably end up being VOICE - i.e., whom do you most want to hear speak dialogue like "By the Crimson Bands of Cytorak!!!"

With that in mind, perhaps a radical suggestion:

Escape to the Movies: Comic-Con 2010 overview


hard link

The week's Intermission: "Film These Heroes."

"Thor" Comic-Con trailer!

Who knows how long this will stay up, but The Pursuitist has a (non-embed) copy of the Thor reel that was shown at Comic-Con up.  So go watch it already HERE: http://pursuitist.com/arts/thor-comic-con-trailer-watch/

Looks pretty damn good if you ask me. The way it's cut looks a lot like what the first "real" trailers will probably look like: A "story" trailer with lots of fanservice in the margins. It's not quite the "holy shit!" of the first Iron Man trailer, but we do get to see how everyone "looks" under proper lighting and post-production, all the main guys in full armor and helmets, how the hammer fighting/throwing is being staged, what the basic story is (Thor depowered and busted-down to Earth, has to prove himself as a hero so he can get his hammer and powers back), how/where it "fits together" with Iron Man 2 and how Destroyer looks in motion. With a few moments snipped for time, this could (and SHOULD) be playing in theaters now.

This is a real thing

via Yahoo!


Classic Animation buffs will, of course, note the irony of a Golden Age Hannah-Barbera character being presented in 33333DDDDD ;)

re: Oliver Stone steps in it

(intended for posting as a response in the Oliver Stone thread, posted on-page instead because it's long-ish)

Anti-semitism is the original sin of Western Civilization. Scratch the surface of ANY extremism and you'll find it down there somewhere. I'm told it's more pronounced in Europe, where it has a longer and more socially-ingrained history, but it bubbles up here in the U.S. on either "side."


By and large, Religious Conservatives seem to "support" Israel because of some sort of End Times fixation. POLITICAL Conservatives, on the other hand, seem to "support" Israel less out of pro-Jewish leanings than anti-Arab leanings. Generalizations, of course, but not unreasonably so.

ACTUAL American Jews, meanwhile, remain a largely liberal/Democrat voting base; though many American liberals (IMO) tend to be foolish and reactionary when it comes to appraisals of Israel/Palestine, as though they're ideology won't let them "process" the idea of a conflict where the rich nation is the "good guys" (re: democratic, primarily fighting on defense) and the poorer nation is full of "bad guys" (re: terrorism, civilian targets, religious bigotry); reflexively "siding" with Palestine without much regard for history. Though I hasten to add, it MUST be noted (by both sides) that The Palestinians are basically being "used" to wage a proxy war by outside-funded agitators at this point in the story.

One death is not "worse" than another in the broad sense, but the Holocaust IS a special case because of it's circumstances and what it symbolizes: The Industrial Age - which was supposed to civilize the world - used to committ THE fundamentally uncivilized act. It was the first genocide-by-assembly-line. That's important. Yes, Hitler DID kill more Russians - but that was a war with both sides taking casualties, something that's been with us since the beginning. Horrible, but not unique.

That people still need the singular uniqueness of The Holocaust "explained" to them, and why so many can shrug it off as some kind of "overrated" atrocity kept alive for sympathy by the omnipresent "Israel Lobby" is why Stone is WRONG, and we DO need to keep focusing on it. Because some of us still just don't get it.

Oliver Stone steps in it

And here we go again.

Oliver Stone has been on a slow slide into irrelevance ever since "World Trade Center" and "W" both more-or-less dissapointed, leading some to wonder if the famously erratic onetime visionary had lost more than a little of his mind. Apparently, in an interview with the London Sunday Times, he opted not to help his case.

In discussing a forthcoming documentary touching on the rise of Nazism, Stone laments a somehow-"outsized" focus on The Holocaust, which he blames on "Jewish domination of the media."

And he didn't stop there. Continues Stone:
"There's a major lobby in the United States. They are hard workers. They stay on top of every comment, the most powerful lobby in Washington. Israel has f***** up United States foreign policy for years."

Yeesh. What, was he reading all Mel Gibson's press and feeling left out?

Did a Marvel movie prop just tease The Avengers' villain?

(Hey look, another new format feature: JUMP BREAKS!)

Shorthand auto-headline for pretty much every image coming out of Comic-Con in relation to the Marvel Films slate: "If This Is What It Looks Like... This Is Awesome." See: Yesterday's web-shuddering revelation of a certain Special Object being somehow involved in "Captain America." (Note, since that story is a report on something that was publically shown at SDCC, I don't know that it counts as a SPOILER or not, but just in case call this a light-warning.)

And then there's THIS rather ostentatious-looking piece of handwear, which was apparently out on the floor along with the already widely-seen Captain America shield and Thor/Loki/Odin helmets. And, well, if this is what it sure-as-hell LOOKS like it is...


...Holy shit.

Fans don't need me to tell them what they seem to be looking at. For non-fans: That's almost-certainly a Marvel Universe MacGuffin known as "The Infinity Gauntlet." Short version: Magic Glove inlaid with six Magic Gems representing absolute power over Time, Space, Mind, Soul, Reality and Power, respectively. If you're wearing it, you're pretty much God. Keeping this from certain bad guys is really, really important. So... it's a more ostentatious "One Ring," would be the idea.

Now, here's why this should give fans something close to an intellectual-erection: While this is supposed to be a prop from "Thor," The Infinity Gauntlet isn't specifically a Thor element in the books. In fact, it doesn't "belong" to any one hero's series or continuity. It's an "everybody" MacGuffin, most-commonly associated with (in fact, created-by) one of Marvel's ultimate "everybody" Big Bads: THANOS.

Created by "cosmic"-specializing artist/writer Jim Starlin, Thanos is a nearly all-powerful alien conqueror who is "the ultimate nihilist" - he is in love with Death (literally - in the Marvel Universe, important esoteric "concepts" like Eternity and Infinity have sentient physical embodiments, and Death is nominally-"female") and typically wants to commit acts of universe-scale genocide in order to impress her. Really.



In other words, EXACTLY the sort of "too big for one guy" threat that Marvel Films' has kept hinting would be the "only" thing that could bring The Avengers together for the movie. He'd certainly be right up there with also-speculated potential enemies like the Skrulls (aliens) H.Y.D.R.A. (Neo-Nazis, James Bond style) The Leader (Tim Blake Nelson at some point after he exits the "Hulk" movie) or A.I.M. (made scientists), but for whatever reason he never seemed to be at the top of anyone's list. Hell, I'd never have even thought to consider him, mostly because he's always been on that list of "Things I'll Never See In a Movie." But, then again, yesterday I never would've believed I'd see a live-action Infinity Gauntlet.

This is really happening.

Is THIS the new "Godzilla?"

Legendary Pictures is prepping another stab at an American-produced "Godzilla" feature, and apparently they've been showing THIS image around Comic-Con. It has an AR (Altered-Reality) stamp on it that makes a roaring sound and particle-effect fire when held up to a webcam that's been teased on AR sites, so apparently it's legitimate product. Question is, is THIS what the new Godzilla actually looks like?


Because if so, color me 99% "sold." I just want to see his feet - I'm hoping they've opted to accept that Godzilla just "has" humanoid proportions and not try and give him more "authentic" tri-jointed legs or feet like most re-design attempts have.

"Avengers" at Comic-Con

So... Marvel Films got the entire "hero cast" of The Avengers up onstage at Comic-Con. Everyone was expecting it, but it's still pretty incredible that this is actually happening.

Also incredible yet wholly expected: Mark Ruffalo is the new Hulk, Jeremy Renner is Hawkeye, and Joss Whedon is directing.

There were also teaser trailers and rough scenes shown for "Thor" and "Captain America," and from Slashfilm I find some details from a "Cap" scene they showed revealing A.) one of the ways Cap will tie in with certain other Avengers characters (what sort of mythology was it Nazis were obsessed with, again? Heh.) and B.) which HUGE piece of the Marvel arcana is playing a previously-unmentioned part... and my mind is now BLOWN!

Escape to the Movies: "Salt"

About the comments...

Okay, so, along with the new formats (still playing with it, content will remain the same) I've decided to go and switch OFF the ability for people to leave Anonymous comments. Didn't want to, still don't feel great about it, but it's the best solution I've got right now. The fact is I don't employ a webmaster to police this stuff, and I have to assume that requiring people to at least IDENTIFY themselves might cut down on some of the trolling.

And to be clear, I mean trolling of OTHER commenters. Say whatever the hell you want about me, fine. Bring it. But I won't tolerate people anonymously-attacking fellow commenters. Period.

SGC 2010 "Video Game Celebrity"

Thanks to ScrewAttack G1 "NovaSpec" for posting a video that I didn't think anyone had taped the whole run of, which more-or-less marked The Game OverThinker's impromptu "public debut."

Here's how this happened: The bad weather kept Brentalfloss from arriving on time for his scheduled live concert (though he did end up doing the whole show later when he actually arrived - that guy is a MACHINE!) so the SA crew had to fill a timeslot. The solution: Get the site regulars onstage to play "Celebrity" (read: Charades-with-proper-nouns) for game characters with the audience (itself split into "USA" and "International" teams.) Being available and willing, they asked me to come up too (playing for "Team International.") Please appreciate what a generous "leap" this was on the part of Stuttering Craig etc - most of them had only just MET me, so there's a certain amount of risk involved in inviting a mostly-unknown quantity to a live mic when YOUR responsible for what they might do. In any case, the whole thing was a ton of fun; and I did pretty good... right up until I blew a would-be comeback win by being unable to figure out how to pantomime Ulala from "Space Channel 5." Ah, well.



These are some funny people, and I reccomend you give everyone a watch, but for fans looking for "my" turns they're at 9:40, 19:40 and 38:40 plus a random silly-dance at 26:09. Enjoy!

more Thor

(trying some new format stuff, nobody freak out)

SLASHFILM has yet another gloriously preposterous "Thor" image up. This time it's a wide shot of the Hall of Asgard, where it appears Thor is recieving a dressing-down from Odin. Frigga (Rene Russo!!??), Loki, Fandral and Hogun are also in attendance. It's hard to make out costume detail, but fans should take note that you can see Odin and Loki both wearing what look like remarkably faithful versions of their comic helmets (that's Loki down on the far left behind Frigga with the big crazy horns.




I must say I'm still really digging the "alien-ness" of the design here - the main inspiration is still clearly reproducing Jack Kirby designs in live-action (I really want to know if Brannagh has just been a fan this whole time, or if he and his designers looked at old Thor comics and immediately decided "this is what we're doing.") and Kirby was famously fascinated by the Ancient Astronaut/"Chariots of The Gods" theory of mythology, i.e. "Gods" as primitive man's interpretation of contact with extraterrestrials. Maybe that's the "answer" of how this ties in to the rest of the Avengers etc. "universe," that THIS Thor etc. are/were alien or extra-dimensional superbeings and the ones we know from Norse myth are actually these guys as-described by early humans who didn't fully "comprehend" them? I've heard worse ideas, and like the man said "any technology, sufficiently advanced, would be indistinguishable from magic."

Game OverThinker in SGC2010 TOP TEN!

Hey gang!


ScrewAttack.com has their Top 10 Moments recap of SGC 2010 up at GameTrailers, and my impromptu (and unscripted) "debate" with The Game UnderThinker came in #3! Plus there's a whole bunch of stuff in there to give you an idea of what you missed if you weren't there - including Spoony, The Angry Nerd, Brentalfloss and the INSANE mayhem wreaked by "Keith Apicary" upon the hotel and convention area. Check it out below:


Can't embed for some reason, so click here!

Escape to the Movies: "Inception"

The first image of Green Lantern...

...looks really, really, REALLY bad. Courtesy of Entertainment Weekly's "Comic-Con Issue."

http://popwatch.ew.com/2010/07/15/green-lantern-ryan-reynolds/

Not that it matters. The reaction, I mean. Since negative first-impressions on things like this are always innevitably brushed-aside as "fanboy" complaints not worth taking seriously. In fact, let me save various anonymous trolls some time: "Shut up, Fanboy! You're just mad it doesn't look exactly like the gay-ass comic version you fap to in your mom's basement!" There, copy/paste THAT into the comment-box and feel free to add some choice references of your own to weight, appearance and sexual-orientation for that personal touch ;)

But good LORD, what a hideous design - yes, fine, maybe it looks good in motion... but it's hard not to feel bad for Ryan Reynolds having to "wear" that thing - "wear" being in quotes because it's not even a costume, it's a CGI augmentation being made to him after the fact. This is, of course, par for the course for Warner Bros., who evidently remain so ashamed of "having" to make superhero movies there's no amount of extraneous detailing they won't add to make the costumes look like anything OTHER than a superhero costume (See-also: Batman's awful lumpy bat-armor, Superman's overdesigned threads and, in the comics, Wonder Woman's new body-conscious-actress-friendly slacks.) In this case, the design-directive seemed to be "Tron-as-reworked-for-a-reptilian-offshoot-of-Furry-fetishism."

Look, I get the logic that a green-and-black body-stocking is a hard sell to audiences who aren't going to see this anyway, and I get that it's supposed to look more like a "construct" of the ring... but it also looks like ass. I mean, ignore the GL logo for a minute and tell me that even if this were some "original" character this wouldn't look completely laughable. The Billy Zane PHANTOM had a better-looking suit than this, and he was wearing a purple skinsuit with a fucking WIDOW'S PEAK!

Fortunately, I can at least partially soothe my dissapointments (this project was sounding so promising!) with the new "Thor" image of Odin, Loki(?) and Thor hanging out in (presumably) Asgard:


I love that. Know what I love about it? Absolutely NO pretending it's anything other than exactly what it is: "Yeah, we're Viking Superheroes. What of it?" Cheezy? OF COURSE it's cheezy! What part of VIKING SUPERHERO wasn't clear enough? And check out the Kirby-esque jagged-line details on Hopkins' armor. Every Marvel movie has reference being "live-action Jack Kirby drawings" at one point or another, but this is the first time anyone actually seems to have gone for it.

"Original Gamer" SGC interview

So... it's taking some time to organize stuff for a "me at SGC video, so for now here's an interview that got done there - spur of the moment - of yours truly by OriginalGamer.com:


http://original-gamer.com/index.php?action=article&id=1505

Lock him up

Evidently, I'm the only person on the internet who was A.) NEVER at all enamored of Colton Harris-Moore, aka "The Barefoot Bandit," aka "D.B. Cooper if the D.B. stood for Douche-Bag; and B.) is not at all broken-up over the fact that police finally took the little brat down in the Bahamas: http://gawker.com/5584243/barefoot-bandit-colton-harris+moore-arrested-in-bahamas

For those not up to speed, Harris-Moore is a 19 year-old "career criminal from Washington State who's managed to become a Twitter-generation "folk hero" for engaging in America's favorite sort of crime-spree - i.e. crime sprees committed by middle-class-appearing white teenagers for shits and giggles (America's LEAST favorite sort of crime spree? Just re-read that and mentally run through the opposites.) During his two year run as a fugitive, his exploits have inspired a MASSIVE Facebook-Friendlist, indie-music folk-anthems, YouTube montages and other assorted detritus of a failing culture. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colton_harris-moore

Anyway, the cuffs thankfully went on before anyone got hurt or killed; which is good overall but DOES mean that now The Legend will only be further romanticized: Along with leaving cutsie-poo "calling cards," Harris-Moore was known for stealing airplanes and boats despite not having formal training in the operation of either, and evading cops by "living off the land" in forests; so he'll probably be hosting a damn "survival reality" show when he gets out.

FOR NOW, expect lots of footage of snot-nosed hipsters with handmade support-signs lining the streets wherever he's transported, an innevitable "My Story" book soon to occupy a treasured place on the bookshelf of every faux-"rebellious" douchenozzle in your neighborhood - right between Steve O's autobiography and the complete-collection of completely-misinterpreted Chuck Palanhiuk novels - and an overrated movie built around a "star turn" by a generic "boyish" actor trying to wriggle out of his Disney contract.

CONFIRMED: Let the New Bruce Banner fancasting BEGIN!!!

Surprising almost no one who's been following this, Marvel Studios now confirms the HitFix story from yesterday about Edward Norton not reprising his role as the human half of The Hulk in "Avengers": http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/2008-12-6-motion-captured/posts/exclusive-marvel-confirms-they-will-hire-new-hulk-for-avengers

The confirmation comes from an exclusive message forwared to HF by President of Production Kevin Feige, which prominently includes the following: "Our decision is definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted in the need for an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative spirit of our other talented cast members."

Translation: Norton is too much of a pain in the ass to work with on this big of a movie - at least from Marvel's perspective. The fact is, Norton is notorious for forcibly inserting himself into the production side of moviemaking; a tendency that's been jointly labeled as "passionate" or "obnoxious" depending what end you were on and what the result was. He and Marvel had a VERY public dust-up over the final cut of "The Incredible Hulk," and they were almost-certainly dreading having to deal with that again... nevermind the unknown factor of how it'd "mesh" with having an already extra-dominant personality at the helm in Joss Whedon.

The MOST interesting thing in Feige's letter is an outright refutation of the original reports that the role would go to an unknown. Says Feige: "We are looking to announce a name actor who fulfills these requirements, and is passionate about the iconic role in the coming weeks."


"Name actor," as in "name you know."

Hey, y'know what would be the BEST time to announce who it is, especially if it's a "good" name - i.e. one that they think will make fans "get over" losing Norton really fast? Comic-Con... a few weeks from now. The timing of this is probably not an accident, and means they're probably already well on their way to a decision.

So what's the "name" gonna be? HitFix's McWeeny tossed out Sharlto Copley, which makes an almost ridiculous amount of sense. And since Whedon is directing every male actor from Angel, Buffy, Firely etc. can all go on The List as well. Anyone else?

Someone else will probably be The Hulk in "Avengers"

With the impending nerdgasm of "The Avengers" movie, fans with a solid grasp of history have probably been wondering what the "uh-oh" x-factor was going to end up being. Well, now we apparently may know: HitFix's Drew McWeeny, formerly "Moriarty" of AICN, reports the not-terribly-shocking-news that while The Incredible Hulk WILL turn up in the film, he will likely not be played by Edward Norton again: http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/2008-12-6-motion-captured/posts/exclusive-edward-norton-is-not-the-hulk-in-the-avengers-but-he-d-like-to-be

This will probably be spun as a cost-cutting decision, but it's equally likely that Marvel Studios simply didn't want to work with him again. Norton has a - perhaps overblown - reputation as an actor who insists on insinuating himself into the production side of things; and for good or one thing that's absolutely true about Marvel Films is that they decidedly NOT running things in an "artists' commune" style a'la Pixar. Definitely dissapointing, but for my money "how" bad this news is is heavily reliant on what movie is actually "about" - specifically, what The Hulk is DOING there.

For non-fans: Technically, Hulk was a "founding member" of The Avengers, but for obvious reasons he A.) only stuck around for two issues and B.) entered as a sort-of enemy: In Avengers #1, the heroes (Thor, Iron Man, Giant-Man and Wasp) initially come together to FIGHT Hulk, then he joins the team after it turns out he was being mind-controlled by Thor's evil brother Loki. In Mark Millar's "Ultimates" re-imagining (which had been called an "outline" for an Avengers movie LONG before there was ever going to be one) this was mirrored by having "fight and contain an out-of-control Hulk" be the big initial obstacle for the team.

In other words, there's a certain amount of precedence for Hulk being the "bad guy" (tool of the bad guy?) in the film, which would necessitate that alter-ego Bruce Banner NOT be onscreen all that much (i.e. Hulk gets beaten and morphs back into "some guy playing Banner" at the VERY end.) Obviously, actor-continuity is fun, but speaking for myself if the choice is "Hulk is in the movie but with a new Banner" or "No Hulk," I pick the first one, easily.

Who's surprised?

There's a great, largely-unremembered Humphrey Bogart / Gloria Graham movie called "In A Lonely Place" that everyone ought to see. It's an ultra-bleak film noir in which Bogie's character, an alcoholic screenwriter suffering from what we'd now call PTSD, begins to put his life back together by romancing his hot neighbor (Graham)... only to see it all scuttled when he finds himself investigated for the murder of a female aquaintance. The tragic arc of the film is that it ultimately doesn't matter if he's innocent or not: The investigation reveals enough of his past and dark side that his few remaining friends/lovers realize that he very probably could have... and thus he's done for. In other words, being accused and having no one doubt it is almost as bad as being guilty.


So I ask you: Regarding actor turned director turned religious-nut turned comeback-kid turned racist (prospective) woman-beater Mel Gibson... in terms of "is this the end?," does it even MATTER if he actually "did it?" When you're alleged to have punched your girlfriend in the face while she's holding your baby and people's reaction is pretty much "Yeah... that sounds plausible," you're DONE as any kind of viable public personality unless your name is Sheen, yes?
In any case, Radar Online now has the (apparent) audio of the infamous "raped by a pack of n****ers" conversation. WARNING: It's a pretty hard listen:
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2010/07/world-exclusive-audio-mel-gibsons-explosive-racist-rant-listen-it-here

Going back to the whole "just as bad as having done it" thing, even if this were a fake or "out of context"... who's surprised? Particularly given the pathetic, self-hating projectionism that seems to be at the root of it: The guy leaves his wife and seven kids for a hot young model... but SHE'S the "whore" and "bitch" for dressing provocatively. (From the tape: "I don't WANT THAT girl!!!") It's the classic, good ol' fashioned "damn the TEMPTRESS for ruining MY righteousness" routine, yes?

Well, given that this IS the same mind that gave us "The Passion of The Christ"... Well, are you at all surprised?

Escape to the Movies: "Predators"

Proposition Infinity

Part of what's been great about the new Comedy Central era "Futurama" episodes is how familiar everything has been - despite the new network, DVD movie run and "down time," everything has popped back into place like a comfortable old show... save for one difference: There's MORE you can do on cable than network, and the writers seem to have taken the newfound freedom as an opportunity to let loose all the pent-up "M-rated" humor and storylines they couldn't use before - "Futurama 3.0" is a MUCH raunchier, more bluntly-sexual show, even compared to the four movies.

It was a touch jarring, at first - the Zap/Leela-as-Adama/Eve episode was a note-perfect riff on the author-working-out-a-fetish substrata of pulp scifi - but in a way it's a logical progression. One of things that's always struck me about "Futurama" was the way it opted - being one of the only (or just THE ONLY?) successful animated sitcom that's not built around a related family - for a thoroughly modern vision of human (etc) relations: The core group of friends/aquaintances fool around, fall into and out of relationships, have quickies, flings and whatnot... without the story "insisting" that this cause long term problems. Fry and Leela remain on/off friends-with-largely-unrequited-benefits, Amy has been with Fry, Zap and Kiff, Leela and Amy had a "moment" while transmuted into fantasy-avatars... okay, so basically it boils down to "everyone gets at least one up-to-bat with Amy," but still it's a decidedly progressive dynamic that you seldom see on ANY TV, let alone animated, and I dig it.

But seeing it come to some kind of "head" in last night's ep, "Proposition Infinity," was pretty remarkable: Bender and Amy is the sort of character-hookup that makes perfect sense only after it's been done, and spinning it off into a social-satire riff as Bender attempts to legalize "Robosexual Marriage" turned out brilliant. Honestly, the whole thing would've been worth it for: "I'm a pre-op Transformer."

I love this show.

SGC 2010

Here's a question I never would've imagined I'd have an answer to: What does it feel like to have beautiful women dressed up like anime/video-game characters asking YOU for a photo and autograph?

Answer: It feels pretty fucking awesome.

Honestly, easily one of the top ten weekends of my life. Meeting fans from as far away as England and Portugal, signing autographs, doing a panel with Spoony, GPX and the Life & Level guys, hosting my own Q&A panel, watching it get fuller with time and being applauded for broad references to "Babylon 5", being invited up onstage with the ACTUAL ScrewAttack crew, improvising a "debate" with The Game Underthinker, meeting Keith Apicary, Brentalfloss, The Angry Nerd and the whole crew in the flesh, being treated like a goddamn rock star - or, at least, moderately-noteworthy musician - for posting jokey videos on the internet... EPIC. There's just no other word for it.

More in-depth type stuff to come but, for now... wow, just wow.

How old is Spider-Man, again?

(FYI, I'm doing this from Dallas right now - at the ScrewAttack Gaming Convention, which is pretty damn awesome so far.)

Anyway, the most frequent reaction people are having to yesterday's casting of Andrew Garfield as the new Spider-Man is how old he is - he's 27 - compared to everyone else they were looking at to play what was supposed to be a high-school aged version of the character?

Well, you might want to hold your horses: In his writeup of the story, HitFix's Drew McWeeny (
http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/2008-12-6-motion-captured/posts/breaking-sony-pictures-announces-andrew-garfield-for-spider-man) drops some information that's certainly news to me (if, in fact, it's news at all.)

Sez Drew: "What we're hearing now though is that Parker starts the series as a college student, and that makes more sense with this casting."


So... College-age would mean... the same as the previous movies, just with new actors and an indie rom-com helmer standing in for Sam Raimi? Or is it still "Twilight" with Spider-Man characters? I'm having trouble deciding which bad idea I hate more...

"Spider-Man: The Quest to Retain Movie-Rights" is scheduled to suck in 3D on July 3rd, 2012.

Escape to the Movies: "The Last Airbender"

It's not good.

It's also not AS bad as you've heard.

But yeah, it's very very not good.

If it makes money, Shayamalan might be "back" jus because he'll have "proven" he can handle an FX-driven feature. If not... yikes.


http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/escape-to-the-movies/1849-The-Last-Airbender

"Intermission" has more elaboration about Twilight and such: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/columns/moviebob/7779-The-Problem-With-Twilight

HEADLINE! Andrew Garfield To Become Most-Hated Man In Movie-Geek Universe!

Figures this would come when I'm trying to get some pre-flight sleep...

Whatever. British actor Andrew Garfield, best (only?) known to moviegoers as Anton in "The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus," is Sony and director Marc Webb's choice to play the hip, happenin' new Peter Parker in their fast-tracked, quick-n-cheap reboot of "Spider-Man." For those who haven't been keeping track, the new film will rewind the story back to High School and rework it into a "Twilight"-style teen romance soap.

This is unfortunate, since Garfield has struck me as a pretty good actor so far - in other words, not deserving of being associated with this pending atrocity - but also somewhat depressingly-funny in at least one sense: On the "celebrity scene," Garfield was at one point best known for being frequently mistaken for another actor...

...named Robert Pattinson.

In other news, it continues to be sincerely hoped that everyone for whom Tobey Maguire doing a silly dance for about a minute in "Spider-Man 3" was the worst thing that ever happened in the history of anything!!!!! continues to be really, really thrilled.

Mashup

Yeah, I know this is about a year old at this point...



Are there any of these with Blade?
 
Support : Creating Website | Johny Template | Mas Template
Copyright © 2011. Izmovies - Watch Full New Movies movies Youtube - All Rights Reserved
Template Created by Creating Website Published by Mas Template
Proudly powered by Blogger